Coalition Provides Statement for the Record to the House Ways and Means Committee on the Implementation of the No Surprises Act

Coalition Provides Statement for the Record to the House Ways and Means Committee on the Implementation of the No Surprises Act

Partnership for Protecting Coverage statement is in response to a hearing entitled “Reduced Care for Patients: Fallout from Flawed Implementation of the Surprise Medical Bill Protections.”

| 3 min read

The 20 undersigned organizations represent more than 120 million patients and consumers across the country who face serious, acute, and chronic health conditions, In March 2017, our organizations agreed upon three overarching principles to guide any work to reform and improve the nation’s healthcare system. These principles state that: (1) healthcare should be accessible, meaning that coverage should be easy to understand and not pose a barrier to care; (2) healthcare should be affordable, enabling patients to access the treatments they need to live healthy and productive lives; and (3) healthcare must be adequate.

Our organizations understand first-hand the financial and physical hardships surprise bills have on our patients and their families. Prior to the passage of the No Surprises Act (NSA), the harms of surprise bills were well documented in both academic literature and the media. Patients were hit with both overwhelming out-of-pocket expenses and increasing premiums. Consequently, our organizations collaborated with state and federal policymakers, including this Committee, to develop evidence-based solutions to curb this harmful practice. We were pleased that the final bill crafted by the House and Senate included provisions that aimed to both protect patients from surprise bills and constrain rising healthcare expenses.

Our organizations celebrated the NSA’s passage in 2020. Since that time, we have worked to raise awareness within our communities about the new protections the law affords our patients. However, we have been disheartened by the overwhelming amount of litigation that has hindered the smooth implementation of the law - depriving patients of its full benefits. This litigation erodes the implementing regulatory guidance and disrupts the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process. We view a reliable, patient-centered IDR process as vital to protecting patients.

No one should go bankrupt because they needed emergency treatment or unwittingly received out-of-network care. We support efforts to build upon the Act’s successes via the regulatory process, including more transparency and swift resolution of payment disputes, without subjecting patients and consumers to higher healthcare costs. We acknowledge that both issuers and providers have been frustrated by aspects of the IDR process and we hope for a resolution that protects patients.

The passage of the NSA was a significant achievement that marked years of effort, and we are concerned that amending the statute may destabilize the gains that have been made - including the potential to hold patients harmless from 10 million surprise bills a year (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2021). Our organizations will continue to work with Congress and the implementing agencies as they proceed with their important work.

Download to Read More
Share this article
Topics
Public Policy

The Foundation regularly submits statements, letters, and comments to legislators for consideration.

View all activity
You might also be interested in...
Stay up to date with The Foundation

Sign up for our newsletter to get all of the latest news from The Foundation right in your inbox.

Subscribe